Mae Clarke: Frankenstein’s First Bride

maeclarkefrankie2

FRANKENSTEIN (1931) airs tonight on TCM at 9:30PM EST/6:30PM PST

The name Mae Clarke might not immediately ring any bells but the fair-haired, spirited and sad-eyed beauty was a promising leading lady in pre-code Hollywood before personal disappointments, mental health issues and a disfiguring car accident took their toll. When Clarke died in 1992 at age 81 most classic film fans remembered her as the woman who gets a grapefruit smashed in her face by James Cagney during THE PUBLIC ENEMY (1931) or they might have recalled her daring leap from a window to protect the man she loves in THE FRONT PAGE (1931). Thankfully, many of Clarke’s earlier films have been restored and made available since then. We’re now able to get a much broader understanding of why a 1932 issue of Picture Play magazine prophesied a “brilliant career for her” and Modern Screen claimed, “Mae Clark deserves a place among the big names of filmdom and will get there before long–watch her!”

Today TCM is featuring Mae Clarke in their Summer Under the Stars programming and you can catch her in a number of films including James Whale’s WATERLOO BRIDGE (1930), where she plays the doomed Myra. Many consider it her best film and Clarke often referred to it as her favorite role but today I’d like to focus on her often-overlooked performance in Whale’s FRANKENSTEIN (1931), where she plays the sympathetic fiancé of Dr. Frankenstein (Colin Clive).

maecMae Clarke was not the studio’s first choice to play Elizabeth. In fact, movie magazines at the time reported that Bette Davis was originally cast in the role but director James Whale apparently thought she was inappropriate and too headstrong for the part and offered it to Mae Clarke. The two had developed a rewarding working relationship on the set of WATERLOO BRIDGE and Whale was eager to have the talented actress join the cast of FRANKENSTEIN. After taking over the role of Elizabeth movie magazines fawned over Clarke and featured her in a number of fashion layouts wearing costumes from the film, including the striking bridal dress that was reportedly reproduced and sold to style-conscious women at the time.

Although the character of Elisabeth may have captured the public’s imagination before the film opened, she was written as a rather conventional movie heroine with very little depth. Despite this, Clarke was able to imbue her character with great sensitivity and profound sorrow. Throughout the film, she frets and worries over her fiancé and his obsession with reanimating corpses made from body parts stolen from graves, hospitals and gallows. While some might find her character rather meek and unsubstantial, Clarke portrays her without irony as a sweet and delicate woman who’s profoundly protective of Frankenstein and his darkest desires. The material lends itself to a melodramatic and baroque interpretation but Clarke’s Elizabeth is surprisingly modern and restrained. She wastes no time with unnecessary hysterics, random fainting spells or unwarranted tears, which were typical of many female horror film protagonists at the time.

Her show-stopping scene occurs during the wedding party sequence where Elizabeth makes a grand entrance wearing one of cinema’s most stunning bridal gowns. As the camera traces her every movement we watch transfixed as the lithe actress elegantly maneuvers through doorways and around furniture while her 15-foot tulle veil trails behind her. When the camera finally catches up to Elizabeth, she confronts her fiancé confessing her fears and trepidation about the day.

The scene emphasizes her character’s vulnerability and compassionate nature but Frankenstein ignores her warnings and abandons his distraught bride. His abandonment allows the monster to enter the room through an open window and it attacks her, leaving Elizabeth’s bruised and battered virginal body strewn across a bed. It’s a startling scene and remarkable for its grotesque beauty that recalls Henry Fuseli’s 18th century painting “The Nightmare” which Mary Shelly referenced in her novel when describing Elizabeth’s murder at the hands of Frankenstein’s monster. Director James Whale undoubtedly used the original text as a reference but in his film, Mae Clarke’s character lives to see another day although it seems likely she was driven temporarily mad by the horrific events that transpired.

maeclarkefrankenstein

It’s worth pointing out that Clarke was truly frightened by Boris Karloff in his makeup and found his ghastly appearance terrifying. Her screams in FRANKENSTEIN are genuine and derive from her own fears although before filming began she and Karloff discussed her feelings and came up with a way to lesson her anxieties. In Bela Lugosi and Boris Karloff: The Expanded Story of a Haunting Collaboration, she described how the two actors collaborated before shooting the infamous bedroom attack so she wouldn’t “fall prey to hysterics.”

“When we rehearsed, I said, ‘Boris, what are we going to do about this? When we play it, and I have all my motors running, and turn and see you, I’ll fall to the floor! I won’t make the bed!’ Boris said, ‘Mae, I’ll tell you what I’ll do. When you turn around my one arm is up–camera; focus on the little finger. I’ll be wiggling it and you’ll know that it’s Boris in make-up.’ So I looked at Boris’s little finger (and it was a little finger compared to the rest of him!) and I was all right–just!” – Mae Clarke

After appearing in FRANKENSTEIN, Clarke’s career should have continued to soar but it suddenly began to fizzle. Various personal problems, including two troubled marriages, the stress of being financially responsible for her parents as well as two younger siblings, compounded by a serious car accident that left her with facial scarring; eventually led to multiple mental breakdowns and lengthy hospital stays. The actress, who enjoyed writing poetry in her free time, was often described as “moody” by the press but these moods were hard to control. She told a reporter at Screen Land in 1932:

“I’m jiggered. I tell myself, ‘you’ve got a good job, you’re young and healthy, you’ve got your family here, you’ve got a nice home–of course it isn’t all paid for yet, but still you’ve got it – you get nice notices for your work’–but it doesn’t do any good. All I can think of is to talk back to myself and say ‘Well–and so what?’” – Mae Clarke

Following her very public breakdowns, Clarke was considered unreliable and troublesome by the same Hollywood executives and journalists who had helped make her a star. Even her mentor James Whale, who had previously directed her in three films (WATERLOO BRIDGE, FRANKENSTEIN and THE IMPATIENT MAIDEN), seemed to lose confidence in Clarke. When it came time to cast the film’s sequel in 1935, Whale reunited many of the original cast members including Boris Karloff, Colin Clive, Dwight Frye and Marilyn Harris, who had played the monster’s young victim, but the role of Elizabeth was offered to a 17-year-old budding starlet named Valerie Hobson.

maecfrankie

According to Gregory William Mank’s Women In Horror Films: 1930s, Clarke was devastated that she hadn’t been asked to return to the role she made famous and work with a cast and crew that she was once called “family.” And although she continued to work in Hollywood, Clarke reportedly never recovered from that professional blow and in later years she often referred to herself as “the real Bride of Frankenstein.” As the starring roles dried up she was eventually reduced to taking bit parts and uncredited roles in various films and television shows but despite numerous career setbacks and personal hurdles, the wraith-like appearance of Mae Clarke laying lifeless across her bridal bed in FRANKENSTEIN has become one of horror cinema’s most iconic images. Magnificently macabre and endlessly alluring, the original “Bride of Frankenstein” remains a fascinating figure in the minds and imaginations of classic horror fans.

Save

12 Responses Mae Clarke: Frankenstein’s First Bride
Posted By swac44 : August 20, 2015 6:11 pm
Posted By Michael Kronenberg : August 20, 2015 6:24 pm

Fantastic piece, Kimberly! Nice to see my pal Greg Mank get a nod.

Posted By Dan Day, Jr. : August 20, 2015 6:38 pm

The more I see of Mae Clarke, the more impressed I am of her as an actress. In “Three Wise Girls”, she practically steals the film from Jean Harlow. Clarke should have been nominated for an Academy Award for her performance in “Waterloo Bridge”.

Posted By Walt : August 21, 2015 2:38 pm

Clarke is exceptionally good in “Waterloo Bridge”. Many performances from this era are very mannered, but she is extremely “natural” in this. It’s really the only movie of her’s I’ve seen besides “Frankenstein” (I’ve seen “Public Enemy” but so long ago that I don’t remember her much), but she was a great actress based on that one performance in “WB”.

Posted By Susan Doll : August 21, 2015 7:17 pm

I watched Clark in LADY KILLER last night, and I thought she was terrific. She had good chemistry with Jimmy Cagney in a film I knew nothing about. I am glad you gave her some much needed attention. I am enjoying the work of the lesser-known stars in the month’s Summer Under the Stars series, more than the icons that I am already familiar with.

Posted By George : August 21, 2015 11:07 pm

A Clarke movie every film buff should see: NIGHT WORLD (1932), sort of a lower-budgeted version of GRAND HOTEL set in a nightclub, with Boris Karloff, Lew Ayres, and George Raft. And Busby Berkeley dance numbers!

Posted By LD : August 22, 2015 7:32 pm

Each time I see Mae Clark in a film I become more impressed with her talent. This time it was LADY KILLER. Nothing against Valerie Hobson, but I wish Clark had been given the opportunity to be in THE BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN, regardless of the challenges she was dealing with at the time.

Posted By Jeffrey E. Ford : August 24, 2015 7:19 am

Here’s another nod for Clarke’s exceptional performance in NIGHT WORLD — and excellent little film that I wish TCM would dig out of the Universal vault. I don’t think that it’s been shown anywhere since it made the rounds on American Movie Classics way back in 1988 (when AMC was worth something)! And another nod for Clarke in LADY KILLER, where Cagney’s treatment of her is far worse than anything like a grapefruit in the face… Nevertheless, the two of them together sure strike sparks. Clarke was also great with Cagney in GREAT GUY.

Posted By Jenni : August 26, 2015 2:33 pm

I also enjoyed Clarke’s work in Public Enemy, and besides getting that grapefruit shoved in her face, Cagney does a lot of grabbing her by the top of her hair and hauling her around-ouch!

Posted By swac44 : August 29, 2015 10:55 am

Watching Parole Girl with Clarke in the starring role right now, there’s a great scene where a hungover Ralph Bellamy stumbles into the breakfast nook, and finds con artist Clarke sitting there eating a grapefruit. That had to be on purpose.

Terrific film, BTW, lots of great pre-code dialogue–Marie Provost asks Clarke to “come back with some dirty stories” when she gets a visitor in prison–and Clarke shows she can carry a picture on her own.

Posted By George : January 15, 2017 9:46 pm

Having finally seen the ’31 version of WATERLOO BRIDGE, I agree that Clarke deserved an Oscar nomination. The scene where she sits before a mirror and mentally transforms herself into a streetwalker is a knockout. If Whale’s film had come from MGM instead of low-prestige Universal, she almost certainly would have been nominated.

As for the long unseen NIGHT WORLD

Posted By George : January 15, 2017 9:47 pm

(continued)

As for the long unseen NIGHT WORLD, if you snoop around on YouTube, you might be rewarded. The opening montage of New York nightlife is dazzling, and that energy level is maintained for the next 55 minutes.

Leave a Reply

Current ye@r *

Streamline is the official blog of FilmStruck, a new subscription service that offers film aficionados a comprehensive library of films including an eclectic mix of contemporary and classic art house, indie, foreign and cult films.